You are viewing la_marquise_de_

Previous Entry | Next Entry

It's Tina's turn: a rant

Caspian
So I really don't know why I watch Glee, a lot of the time. It's sentimental, it's shallow, it's full of cliches and stereotypes and it rarely features music I like. And I really, really, really hate many of the characters. It's Beverley Hills 90210 with show tunes.
And yet I go on watching. Partly that's down to season one, which started so well. It offered us a genuinely varied set of characters from a variety of backgrounds and with a variety of issues. And it seemed to want to honour that, for about half a season. But then the agenda appeared. I loved Kurt: I loved his gallantry and courage and sense of self, I loved his gift for friendship and his ability to understand others. I have always hated Rachel, but back then her sheer selfishness was a feature and we were not expected to sympathise. Will... meh: it's not a teacher's place to share his personal life with his students in that way, and I find him creepy. But Mercedes rocks -- she still does; and so do Santana and Brittany and they have all had reasonable plot lines. Over the three seasons, there have been some great arcs: I am delighted by the Santana/Brittany relationship and how it's been allowed to develop. I love that Mercedes stays tough and isn't skinny, and gets to be cute and sexy and smart and attractive -- and to tell Rachel where to get off. I'm delighted that Artie talks back, has big dreams, can behave like an idiot or a hero like anyone else (the wheelchair user is a Person Just Like Anyone Else). I'm pleased that Kurt has Blaine and that that's presented positively. And ever once in a while, the show has great dancing, and I am, as we know, all about the dancing.
But, but, but...
There's Kurt again. He's still fabulous. All the way to all those scenes where he lectures and humiliates the female characters and is Right. Male problems always trump female ones. Women are always Wrong about things and cause their own unhappiness. Gee, thanks. Those young women are his friends and allies, but the writer wants them to know their place. That hurts. (Blaine is kinder, thankfully. But I sense that the script is on Kurt's side, slut-shaming. The way he spoke to Quinn in the latest episode and the way, in particular, he was a mouthpiece for making sure we all know that a girl who gets pregnant, is thrown out by her parents, is humiliated at school, marginalised and patronised, made to give up her child and then made to behave in ways that suit others, hasn't really suffered at all, because... Well, Kurt claimed everyone went on loving her really, which is just not true within the show's own continuity. But men have it worse, in Glee world. Note we did not get a plot-line about Santana starting, say, to self harm, when she was outed and her grandmother rejected her. She's just a girl, after all.)*
And then there's Tina. I love Tina, she was my favourite character from the start. The shy misfit girl who *doesn't* have a huge ego hiding her insecurity. The bright one who no-one really seems to want to know. The one who wants to be liked but only knows how to pretend. At the start, she got some attention from the writers. She got to increase in confidence, to form a very sweet relationship with Artie. In season two, she got to stand up for herself. But she has never got fair screen time. She gets one or two lines. She doesn't get songs, or even, very often, lines in songs or close-ups. She doesn't get to do anything except back-up Rachel on stage and off. That's been the pattern for two seasons now, and was rather the pattern in a lot of the first. She was given a song, remember, and Rachel complained, and Tina was nice about it, gave it up and that was it. Rachel learnt nothing, except to add to her entitlement. The script told us Tina was a good girl, 'taking one for the team'. Because the people who don't matter must do that.
And Tina doesn't matter. Like the song says, 'Nobody's Asian on tv'. Like original Star Trek back in the day, Glee is leaning back on its laurels, patting itself on the back about how inclusive it is -- while tokenising its Asian characters completely. Apparently it's enough that they're there. Oh, we get the occasional crumb. Mike got a typical Asian story earlier this season, when he got an A- and his parents were angry. Because the Asian characters can't be real people, oh no. (There was briefly a Chinese family on Brookside, the defunct UK soap. They did nothing, because the writers apparently thought that only 'Asian' stories could be told about them, and they only knew one or two of those. Same is true of the characters of Indian origin on Eastenders: nothing to write about there except white assumptions about perceived prejudices in their religion, and arranged marriage.)
I hoped, for 4 or 6 episodes, back at the start of Glee that Tina -- and Mike,when he joined the main cast -- would get to be a real character, like Rachel or Kurt or the eternally boring, pointless Finn who we're all supposed to find so fascinating. But I was put right pretty soon. Tina isn't a person, she's an Asian Face, and that's supposed to be good enough.
It isn't. Not in any way at all. It's racist. It's unacceptable.
At the end of the current season, several of the characters graduate and, in theory, should leave the show. Including Rachel, Finn and Kurt. In theory: the rumour is those characters will still be around somehow. Tina isn't a final year student (Mike is). Season 4 could be her turn to shine. The show has a great chance here to show us that she is a person after all. She has hopes and dreams and problems -- not just 'Asian' problems. In my world, this could be the year Tina gets to be the star, to have a life just like Rachel and Kurt. Or maybe she could share the spotlight with Mercedes: they are, we are told (but seldom shown) great friends. There could be some wonderful stories in that, friends becoming rivals or, even better, refusing to be made into rivals and finding new ways to share and deal.
It won't happen, of course. Tina isn't white-bread pretty. Tina doesn't tick the boxes that define 'people'. Tina's only Asian. What we'll gt is a new set of angst-ridden, plot-absorbing pretty white characters, with maybe, if we're lucky, a bit more screen time for Mercedes (but she won't be the star, either, because she isn't thin enough, she isn't white enough). Mike will graduate and go and never been seen again. Rachel and Finn and Kurt will be back every other week, to suck up all the screen-time and take all the starring roles. Because they're the only kind of people who matter.
And that makes me angry and sad, because it's a lie, and a pernicious one. And this show claims that it doesn't do that kind of thing. That it's all about celebrating difference.
So long, of course, as you're white.

*I don't agree with Quin that suicide is never an option. And the plot about Karofsky's suicide attempt is heartbreaking and all too realistic and I hate that young gay men are subjected to these pressure. But that's not my point. My point is that the show put the lines about suicide being selfish and bad into Quinn's mouth, not, say, Artie's or Puck's, and then reveled in having Kurt tell her off and reduce her experiences to trivia. And that isn't acceptable. Oddly, being publicly slut-shamed, pregnant and rejected destroys young women's lives and some of them attempt suicide too. And that isn't a lesser form of suffering just because they aren't male. I suspect, too, that Quinn is about to be killed off, to angst-up Rachel, and because she's just a spare woman these days, and those don't really matter. The fact is the show did not need to humiliate a woman to have this plot-line (and the earlier one about Blaine coming to terms with his sexuality did not need to include a speech from Kurt humiliating Rachel, with the script on his side).

Tags:

Comments

( 28 comments — Leave a comment )
gillpolack
Mar. 31st, 2012 12:00 pm (UTC)
This makes me relieved I don't watch Glee. It's not just Glee, though - a lot of programs are shifting in tone and in those directions. It worries me.
la_marquise_de_
Mar. 31st, 2012 02:29 pm (UTC)
Yes, I think you're right about that.
mizkit
Mar. 31st, 2012 12:54 pm (UTC)
Having only watched a few episodes of Glee, all, I think, from the first season, I am dismayed by this. But then, within the few episodes I've seen I was pretty dismayed that Mercedes wasn't, y'know, like, the lead. Because she should be, and not because she's black or fat and therefore needs to be put in a leading character because she's Representative Of Something, but because she's hands down got the most powerful voice and charisma of the characters on the show, and I have this crazy idea that talent should trump all.

There are moments when I think I've stepped through from a different reality, you know? One that makes even just slightly more sense than this one. Meh.
la_marquise_de_
Mar. 31st, 2012 02:32 pm (UTC)
Yes, the perpetual hyping of Rachel over Mercedes baffles me, because, as you say, Mercedes (Amber Riley) has by far the most talent in singing terms. They've done better, marginally, by Harry Shum Jr (Mike) than Jenna Ushkovitz (Tina) because he is just such an astonishing dancer that they really can't not showcase it. But in a fair world, Riley and Shum would be the leads on pure talent.
pennski
Mar. 31st, 2012 02:56 pm (UTC)
Yup. This sort of thing is what led us to stop watching. Which is a shame because it could be such a great show - and isn't.
la_marquise_de_
Mar. 31st, 2012 06:13 pm (UTC)
Precisely. It could do so much so well, and yet...
bookzombie
Mar. 31st, 2012 02:59 pm (UTC)
It makes me laugh when they put Rachel against her screen mother (Idina Menzel) as it makes it perfectly clear how superior a singer Menzel is...
la_marquise_de_
Apr. 1st, 2012 09:43 am (UTC)
I don't know enough about show singing to judge. And, from an acting perspective, Lea Michele is excellent as Rachel -- she really conveys the mix of selfish arrogance and insecurity and can make her character very understandable and even sympathetic. It's the characters I have issues with and the way they are presented, not the acting, which is, overall, very good.
mizkit
Mar. 31st, 2012 03:13 pm (UTC)
There really are moments when I'm convined I ended up in the wrong timeline. The current kerfuffle over black actors being cast in The Hunger Games, which I haven't even read, boggles my mind, because my invariable reaction to non-whites being cast in anything mainstream is "Yay!"

But then, as I have said before, ten years ago when the first movie came out, I thought Taye Diggs should be cast as Gambit in the X-Men films, because I'm not sure there was a prettier, more charismatic man on the planet at the time, and those qualities completely trumped ethnicity in my book...
la_marquise_de_
Apr. 1st, 2012 09:48 am (UTC)
I thought Idris Elba was the perfect Heimdall. And he'd have been even better as Thor. I want to see Clarke Peters play Lear, too: he would be fabulous, he is so nuanced and subtle and thoughtful. Sanada Hiroyuki played MacBeth a few years ago (and I didn't get to see it, d*mnit) and garnered fantastic reviews. It's the acting skills that count and nothing else.
Angela Bassett should have played Storm, though, not Halle Berry. I don't mind Berry, but she was all wrong for Storm (and not as gifted as Bassett). I can't help but suspect that the relative success of the two is down to skin tone. Berry is very light-skinned...
People are vile sometimes, they really are. I want to live in your timeline!
mizkit
Apr. 1st, 2012 12:01 pm (UTC)
Idris Elba was magnificent. I actually thought his eyes were gold and was so crushed to find out they weren't. :)

I think there is no one in the entire universe who is in disagreement over the idea that that Angela Bassett should have played Storm.

kateelliott and I were having a discussion the other day about how we would desperately like to see Chiwetel Ejiofor play Darcy in a new Pride & Prejudice, but I honestly can't think of somebody I like well enough to see play Elizabeth against his Darcy. :)
la_marquise_de_
Apr. 2nd, 2012 09:37 am (UTC)
Oh, yes!
As to Elizabeth, I nominate Indian actress Vidya Balan. She's terrifically talented and has just the right edgy crispness.
seph_hazard
Apr. 1st, 2012 10:48 pm (UTC)
The very worst thing about that kerfuffle, of course, is that it is over the fact that black actors were cast to play characters who are described as being black in the books..
la_marquise_de_
Apr. 2nd, 2012 09:38 am (UTC)
Yes: that says all sorts of things about the extraordinary levels of white privilege in the objectors. They can erase anything that doesn't suit them, and will scream if others interfere with their exercise of their racism.
a_d_medievalist
Mar. 31st, 2012 05:09 pm (UTC)
I haven't seen any of the new seasons, but always wished they'd bothered to even explain Tina's name: after all, it's Cohen. How did she not get mentioned in the Jewish plot lines? Why do we assume her parents are culturally the same as Mike's, rather than Rachel's or Puck's?

And yes on Kurt, although I think that the may not be the same one you think. Kurt is super-sympathetic in some ways, but when he's not, it's when his male privilege comes out. It was pointed out earlier that the way he treated Finn (which was icky and stalkery) would be considered totally unacceptable if Kurt were pursuing a woman, which really did emphasize the "no means no" lesson -- although it also reinforced certain homophobic stereotypes, so I'm not sure that it was a win...
la_marquise_de_
Mar. 31st, 2012 06:15 pm (UTC)
I think you're right about the male privilege, and that's the problem: we're being asked to excuse it or to believe it isn't there on the grounds of his sexuality. But it is there and it shows, and in ways that don't speak well of the show's attitudes and beliefs.
And yes on the homophobic stereotype.
aliettedb
Mar. 31st, 2012 05:57 pm (UTC)
I don't watch Glee, but I hate that. It's the same in Big Bang Theory, where Raj's storyline is getting nowhere and is full of the clichés about immigrants and Indian arranged marriages and the like. Talk about tokenising...
la_marquise_de_
Mar. 31st, 2012 06:16 pm (UTC)
That's another one that's been winding me up. Howard -- the serial sexual predator -- is allowed a love interest, and a smart funny one, because, oh, white boy. But Raj? Oh, no. Because he's Not A Person.
al_zorra
Mar. 31st, 2012 06:11 pm (UTC)
I HEAR your last paragraph all right!

Not that I watch this show. For one thing, the music is not mine cuppa. Many, many forms of music are, but not this kind of delivery and not the material either.

Love, C.
la_marquise_de_
Mar. 31st, 2012 06:16 pm (UTC)
I wish I didn't watch it: it's a horrible addiction!
llwheeler
Mar. 31st, 2012 09:30 pm (UTC)
I've only seen about 2/3 of the first season but I thought finn's mom and kurt's dad were some of the best characters. Also I adore Menzel and Chenoweth's voices, it's the Wicked fangirl in me.

But I am sad to hear the show goes nowhere with its promise of inclusion and acceptance.
la_marquise_de_
Apr. 1st, 2012 09:42 am (UTC)
I love Finn's mom and Kurt's dad: they are excellent characters. As are Rachel's dads, in fact. But yes, it could have been so very good...
anna_wing
Apr. 2nd, 2012 03:58 am (UTC)
I don't watch this and your comments don't inspire me to do so. FOr my part, the sexism is more worrying to me than the racism. The latter will sort itself out eventually as whites become a minority in the US. Sexism is general across cultures and times, and until women are truly free no-one is truly free.
la_marquise_de_
Apr. 2nd, 2012 09:39 am (UTC)
It's all worrying to me, I have to say.
anna_wing
Apr. 3rd, 2012 06:10 am (UTC)
Racism in my own society, yes. But the internal domestic pathologies of the US don't matter to me.
la_marquise_de_
Apr. 3rd, 2012 08:20 am (UTC)
It worries me because the US has tendency to export its problems into Europe.
anna_wing
Apr. 3rd, 2012 10:55 am (UTC)
In this case, from the viewpoint of an observer both disinterested and uninterested, I don't think it actually can. The whole poisonous black/white thing is very specific to US history and culture. The faultlines of racism in Europe are different, and vary a lot from country to country. Racism in general one finds everywhere, but the particular US manifestation of it has very little relevance to anywhere else.
la_marquise_de_
Apr. 3rd, 2012 11:25 am (UTC)
Alas, not so much any more. It's hard to explain, but there is a tendency from some people to assume that imitating the US is desirable. SIgh.
( 28 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

April 2013
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com