09 November 2011 @ 03:38 pm
top 5 ways to fix doctor who series 6  
turtle_goose asked for my top 5 ways to fix series 6. "CHANGE EVERYTHING" didn't seem like a good answer, so I tried to work within the constraints of the basic plot outline of this season. Obviously this is really a top 5 ways to tweak series 6 to my liking.


5. An actual exploration of the Doctor's dark side instead of two-second lipservice in a hypocritical speech.


"Doctor, you're such a jerk! It's totally hot though, negl."

Of all my suggestions this is the vaguest, but I do think it would've increased my enjoyment by like a billion. All the promo for this season said we would see THE DARK SIDE OF THE DOCTOR and this excited me because I love nothing more than seeing the dark side of the Doctor! And in the second episode we got the Doctor brainwashing humanity into committing genocide for him without even knowing it. Pretty dark, right? Except that was never ever discussed or brought up or criticized by the text or addressed and was in fact presented as a-okay and a super-clever trick. Ha HA! Take that, Silence! You brainwash humanity into horrible things like TECHNOLOGY and SPACE TRAVEL? Well I'LL brainwash them to SLAUGHTER YOU ALL! Who's the puppetmaster now?? Also, that time Eleven pushed the burden of leaving oldAmy onto Rory and then left Rory to explain the fuckery to youngAmy? Super douche move, dude! But it's okay, we'll have forgotten next episode anyway.

Meanwhile, the Doctor winning a bloodless victory to save his friend and her baby (ha ha, except not) earns him a slap on the wrist from River Song -- who, by the way, will praise him for the very same things later in the Library when she stans for Eleven. What? First off, if you want to establish the Doctor's ruthlessness when you mess with his companions, a bloodless victory where he says some mean things to that one guy is not really the most powerful way to go about it. But okay. Second, River's entire speech, which is otherwise well-written, is negated because it IS precisely what she praises Eleven for later in her life.

And then the season culminates in the entire universe telling the Doctor that he is loved AND BY NO ONE MORE THAN THE CHILD HE LOST WHO WAS RAISED TO MURDER HIM BUT NOW IS IN LOVE WITH HIM BECAUSE SHE READ HIS WIKIPEDIA PAGE and ... just... what? Is that supposed to be a consequence? WHY DON'T WE GO BACK TO THAT TIME HE BRAINWASHED HUMANITY???

4. Amy and Rory leave on their own at the end of The God Complex

"See ya, douchebag."

I actually liked The God Complex, more than I liked most episodes in series 6. I didn't even hate the ending. But I do think it would've been much stronger and worked just as well within the episode if Amy and Rory had chosen to leave. In the previous episode Rory gets furious with the Doctor and says he doesn't want to travel with him anymore. In God Complex, we see Eleven finally break Amy's faith in him by confronting her with who he really is and what their relationship really is. That's cool! But it would've been even better if Amy and Rory had said "okay, you know what, I think we need to go home while we're still alive and still sane". It would've confronted the trauma Amy and Rory were put through in series 6 and could've acknowledged the emotional damage that travelling with Eleven was doing to them. It would have given Amy back some of the agency she had brutally ripped away in this season, and it could have been just as -- if not more -- powerful than the goodbye we did get. And it would've helped with #5, since the Doctor would be facing a consequence for his actions as brought on by his companions and not his own self-loathing.

3. The Doctor re-writes River's childhood to give the Ponds their baby back.

"Turns out your baby was at Burlington Coat Factory! What a happy coincidence!"

Rewriting River's past so that Melody is raised by her parents and not by a crazy murderous organization was a possibility that I wish had actually been a possibility. I think the text wants us to accept that it's off the table without ever even discussing it, which is in my opinion a mistake. The Doctor saving Melody Pond as a baby to return her to the Ponds would've been interesting for a couple reasons -- first, it would get rid of the "why the fuck is she even their baby?" problem, it would give the Ponds a happier ending in a universe where they care about their baby, it would show that the Doctor doesn't just disregard a baby being stolen, and it could even be a gesture of the Doctor's love for Amy and Rory, sacrificing his own future happiness/relationship with River in order to give Amy and Rory their child back.

At the same time, it would be incredibly morally ambiguous. Is that a dark resolution, erasing a character we've grown to know for the happiness of other characters? Probably. Is it really the Doctor's right to decide? Well, probably not. But we've had two seasons of the constant refrain that "time can be rewritten". We've seen a precedent for this, both in A Christmas Carol and The Girl Who Waited. The Doctor does what he thinks is right even when the decisions aren't always his to make. Rewriting River could be very dark (again! Point 5!) and very emotional and would be payoff for those other times we've heard that "time can be rewritten".

2. The Doctor makes an explicit choice not to rewrite River's childhood in order to give the Ponds their baby back.

"Unfortunately, Ponds, it would seem I moral standards after all."

Okay, some of you are probably saying BUT THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED! But I don't think it is, not really. Sure, maybe the Doctor did decide that he couldn't erase River's life like that so the timeline had to stand. But we never see him explicitly state that choice on screen. We never see him weigh the options, or feel guilty, or discuss it with Amy and Rory. The storyline would have been VASTLY more interesting to me if the crux of the season had been a conflict between the Ponds and the Doctor over the right thing to do. Amy and Rory could've argued their point, because they want their child back and while they like River, their infant child should be more important to them -- and why would they want their daughter to have a terrible, traumatic upbringing? Besides, the Doctor has spent over a season now telling them that "time can be rewritten" and doing just that.

There's so much to explore there, all sorts of moral ambiguity and character conflict... and maybe in the end the Doctor decides that River's right to exist is more important, that it's wrong of him to rewrite people's whole histories as he sees fit like he did to Amy and even Kazran, and that not everything can or should be rewritten. Maybe in the end he makes the hard decision and has to try and explain to the Ponds that he can't give them their baby back because that would mean erasing River Song and he doesn't have the power or authority to do that. There's tonnes of stuff to explore in the decision that the Doctor apparently made this season, but we didn't explore any of it.

1. The Doctor rescues Melody, the Ponds raise their baby, and then she grows up to be River Song anyway because there's absolutely no reason that can't happen.

"PS I KNOW YOU USED TO EAT MY HALLOWEEN CANDY, I FOUND THE WRAPPERS."

Of all of these, this one is the one that makes me weep the most bitter tears because there's no reason this couldn't be true, the season could've turned out plotwise near-identical, and it wouldn't have made me want to punch as many walls.

So, scenario: Eleven actually does what he promises Amy he can do, and goes and rescues Melody Pond from the Silence so that the Ponds can raise their damn baby and Melody doesn't have a traumatic, brainwashed upbringing. SO THEY DO. Melody is raised by her parents on Earth and maybe she has some adventures with the Doctor, I don't know who cares. Point is, after a lifetime or so, she regenerates once or twice because she's a Time Lord for whatever reason, and eventually she becomes Alex Kingston and maybe hitches a ride to the 51st century and becomes an archaeologist (and hey! ofc she would be interested in "ancient" history if she's from the 21st century) who goes by River Song. She has a backwards relationship with the Doctor, marries him in a scenario that is not as fucked up as 6x13 was, and even gets a few adventures with her parents -- which, for her, are now infinitely more poignant and meaningful because her loving mum and dad are long-since dead in her timeline. IF ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY, maybe she even agrees to help the Doctor fake his death and take the fall for it. Maybe. (And maybe he even argues with her because he doesn't want her to have to do that but it's actually her choice outside of him manipulating her via marriage?? MAYBE.)

NOTHING EVEN HAS TO CHANGE. NOTHING. BECAUSE MAYBE THIS IS WHAT HAS ALWAYS HAPPENED IN RIVER SONG'S LIFETIME. So she becomes sassy badass River Song on her own -- or with the influence of her badass parents and their awesome bedtime stories -- and eventually seeks a relationship with the Doctor on her own. And maybe chooses to help "kill him" ON HER OWN. And then we wind up with the River Song we've always had, but without all the icky brainwashing-turned-looooove and with some semblance of a life outside the Doctor.

DONE.
 
 
( Read 82 commentsLeave a comment )
Kali: dw :: rose :: you were fantastic_thirty2flavors on November 12th, 2011 09:57 pm (UTC)
Yeah, originally "not make River the Pond baby" was in here, because I think that was a pointless trick that did nothing for any of the characters and was actually detrimental tot hem, but I decided to keep these 5 working within the basic constraints of the season.

RIGHT? I agree so much with your second paragraph. The problem isn't having him do dark things, the problem is not ever addressing them and thereby passing them off as fine and dandy. In general my main problem with the show as of late can be boiled down to the lack of consequence everyone's actions seems to have. Nothing really matters because no one ever pays for any mistakes or faces any consequences for their actions or even seems to dwell on or deal with things. This was a problem in series 5 as well, but not nearly to the extent it was in series 6.
Fred Dumplingariad on November 13th, 2011 02:22 am (UTC)
TOTALLY. It's as if the writers or the executive producers or maybe just Moffat (I have no idea how much say in the plot the other writers or producers have, but I am thinking little because I don't imagine something this convoluted and nonsensical being filtered through many people) made a list of plot points that they wanted to happen and didn't bother to connect them to the characters' wants and concerns or even to the other plot points. As a result, nothing the characters do make sense, alternate better plans of action are dismissed without consideration, and scenes that had the potential to be powerfully emotionally resonant are instead rendered totally unbelievable. (Churchill: "Yo, Doctor, why'd you invite your buddies to witness your death?" Doctor: "I had to fake my death. I didn't have to fake my death alone. Besides, wasn't it funny how I let Amy grieve for all those months before I revealed what a dick I am?" + River: "I love you!" Doctor: "You embarrass me." River: "But I love you!" Doctor: "Marry me.") The show has been basically reduced to scene after scene of things happening. Because they're cool. Or something.
Kali: dw :: doctordonna :: flapper_thirty2flavors on November 13th, 2011 02:36 am (UTC)
dying @ Churchill: "Yo, Doctor, why'd you invite your buddies to witness your death?" Doctor: "I had to fake my death. I didn't have to fake my death alone. Besides, wasn't it funny how I let Amy grieve for all those months before I revealed what a dick I am?"

I don't think I ever even connected the dots before. I mean I always thought it was kind of a dick move to invite his friends to watch him die, even if the idea of "I didn't want to die alone" is understandable enough... BUT THEN OH WAIT YEAH, HE WASN'T DYING AT ALL, HE WAS FAKING HIS DEATH WITH A ROBOT. Omg omg I can't.

Scene after scene of "things happening" is a really good way to put it. Some stuff happens, none of it really seems to matter, the end. Tune in next weekend, when more stuff happens!
fauxkarenfauxkaren on November 13th, 2011 02:56 am (UTC)
I don't think I ever even connected the dots before. I mean I always thought it was kind of a dick move to invite his friends to watch him die, even if the idea of "I didn't want to die alone" is understandable enough... BUT THEN OH WAIT YEAH, HE WASN'T DYING AT ALL, HE WAS FAKING HIS DEATH WITH A ROBOT. Omg omg I can't.

I HAD NOT THOUGHT OF THAT BEFORE EITHER.

BUT NOW OMG.

ELEVEN IS SUCH A DICK. I HATE HIM.
Kali: dw :: ten :: my other OTP_thirty2flavors on November 13th, 2011 02:59 am (UTC)
I'm constantly surprised by his dickery tbh. I THOUGHT HE WAS 'THE NICE ONE', INTERNET!

Do you ever think about what a mess Fandom March Madness is gonna be this year, 'cause I do.
fauxkarenfauxkaren on November 13th, 2011 03:01 am (UTC)
But he wear silly hats and bow ties! So he is obviously nice. Duh.

LOLLL I DO. I AM LOOKING FORWARD TO ANTI-ELEVEN STANNING.
Kali: dw :: ten :: burnt orange sky_thirty2flavors on November 13th, 2011 03:08 am (UTC)
IT WAS SUCH A NASTY WAR LAST YEAR AND LAST YEAR ALL I HAD AGAINST ELEVEN WAS THAT I DIDN'T THINK HE'D HAD ANY DEVELOPMENT. Oh lawd.
fauxkarenfauxkaren on November 13th, 2011 03:19 am (UTC)
I am pretty much going to be stanning for anyone that isn't Eleven or River, depending on how the poll is shaping up. IT WILL BE GLORIOUS.
Fred Dumpling: harry potter // here is a world you cannariad on November 13th, 2011 03:19 am (UTC)
Yeah, I'm not sure the trio watching the Doctor die actually accomplished anything.

I would make sense for him to invite them to meet Canton so that they can go back in time and stop/delay the Silence to some poorly elucidated effect, but:

1) he never explains that
2) he can do that without them watching him die
3) he'd have to see the envelopes at Craig's place and think, "Oh, I got one of those just before we went on that adventure to 1969. I bet I sent those and that I also sent one to Canton so that he could tell the others to tell me to go on that adventure to 1969."

It would also make sense for him to make sure someone could burn the Tessalecta so that nobody could swoop in to harvest the Time Lord body and figure out that it's a fake, but:

1) he never explains that
2) he can do that without all of them watching him die
3) IN FACT HE COULD JUST INVITE CANTON and then have his buddies arrive half an hour later for Canton to drop "space 1969" at them.

So yeah. idk what's going on there. It's such a shame because I really liked the season openers back when I believed they would be adequately explained, but now THEY ARE TAINTED.