um...okay...i could see what he was going for, but all of the little kids sucked at acting, except for the one who played charlie. johnny was good but his character just sucked and was written horribly. and don't even get me started on the oompa loompas...since when are oompa loompas indian midgets in their late 40's all digitally copied so they look the same? yeah...nay on this one.
July 20 2005, 04:45:50 UTC 6 years ago
July 20 2005, 06:11:06 UTC 6 years ago
i believe the three of you are mistaken....horribly.
i believe when u guys get back, i must school you on what is a good movie
don't mess with my burton or i cut u.
July 21 2005, 00:22:06 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 06:26:41 UTC 6 years ago
i agree that johnny's character is a litttle too out there, but i really enjoyed the difference between gene wilder's wonka and johnny's wonka
umm, oompa loompas were SWEET.
i believe we must agree to disagree, (but i'm so right, hehehe)