It's clever, but is it art?
Grayswandir's Journal 
17th-Jan-2009 07:57 pm - Okay, but for real this time.
One Hundred Years of Solitude: Aureliano
Last post on this subject for a while. I promise.

I said yesterday that Tolstoy was a mediocre philosopher. He is. I also said he was a good writer. That was an understatement. So here's a more balanced report. No spoilers. )

I don't know what I'll be reading next. The reason it occurred to me how far I'd underestimated Tolstoy is because I've been trying to start on some other book, but nothing I pick up comes anywhere close to Tolstoy's eloquence, and I find myself doing more criticising than reading. So far, King Lear is the only thing I've tried that I haven't been able to find fault with. ...So much for lighter reading. :P
Marx Brothers - wonderful evening
Well, I've finally finished reading War and Peace. It turned out to be, at bottom, a 1400-page treatise on determinism. I feel it only fair to warn those of you who may be interested in reading it. The characters are good, the writing is good, it's easy to read, and there are some interesting ideas along the way. But ultimately, the point is that free will exists only as a kind of necessary unknown factor without which we could not call ourselves human, but has no meaning; ultimately the point is that everything done by anybody was predestined by God from the dawn of time (or rather outside of time), and no one could ever have acted any differently than they did. Especially not Napoleon, which is what makes him the most odious of all. Apparently.

I will also add, though of course this is entirely my own opinion, that Tolstoy is a thoroughly mediocre philosopher. His arguments, when they aren't the same ones that have been advanced for centuries, are almost irrelevant; his metaphors are mostly complete nonsense; and even when he makes a valid point, he often does so by proofs which are completely inscrutable. Dostoevsky made a better argument for determinism in five or ten pages of Notes From Underground -- and Dostoevsky didn't even believe in it.

I think it may be time for some lighter reading.
1st-Jan-2009 01:16 pm - Oh look, another post about fiction.
SP: 1979
And welcome to 2009! *confetti*

While waiting around last night for the changing of the year, I decided to try out Borges, beginning with "The Immortal," which [info]agguss recommended to me ages ago. I can see that Borges will very probably be going down on my favorite authors list. )

I'm also a bit over 600 pages into War and Peace now, and rather amused that spoilers )

And those appear to be my beginning-of-the-year thoughts. New year, same pointless ramblings!
27th-Dec-2008 10:06 am - books and movies
V for Vendetta
Items:

1) The Spirit has reminded me why I never go to the theater. Ten dollars for *that*? )

2) I'm a bit over 300 pages into War and Peace. I was worried that it would be slow reading, and 1400 pages of it, at that -- but it's actually surprisingly fast-paced; more so than a lot of other authors of the period, anyway. My only difficulty with the book so far is in keeping track of its typical Russian superabundance of characters. )

Oddly, War and Peace is also having the unexpected side-effect of making me really excited about Napoleon. )

3) I guess this post would be the place to tell me what books I should buy with my gift cards. ;) Of course, I've already got a list; foremost among the books I'm planning to buy are these. ) But anyway, I'm shopping at Bookman's, where everything is used and cheap, so if I have any money left over, I'll want to know what I should spend it on. And it's always nice to have options! :)
This page was loaded Jan 8th 2010, 5:06 am GMT.